Jimin Jibao

Home / War on bookies / Stories

The top of the list. Paid for.

Bookmaker comparison sites look like reviews. Most of them are adverts, and new bettors trust them anyway.

Jimin Jibao in the LED mask. The video for this page is coming.

In October 2026 the racing account Racing Tips shared a bettor's story on X, and it passed 49,000 views. The story is bad enough. But the line that matters most is in the replies:

"These brands are at the top of comparison sites and people get lured in when they aren't tried and tested sites."
An email from Rollerbet support asking for a 5% processing fee to withdraw a deposit, next to the X post shared by Racing Tips about a blocked £1,000 deposit, and the replies about comparison sites
Shared on X by Racing Tips. Another commenter's name blurred.

How the list gets made

Most "best bookmakers" sites are paid by the bookmakers they list: a fee for every new customer they send, or a share of what that customer loses for months or years. So the order of the list is often the order of the commission. The brand at the top isn't the one you can trust most. It's the one paying most to be there.

New brands pay the most, because nobody has heard of them. They need your first deposit, and the comparison site sells them the spot where you will see them first.

That is why I take no affiliate money. Not from bookmakers, and not from anyone whose profit is your loss.

What it cost this bettor

He saw Rollerbet, described in the post as a new UK firm, near the top of a couple of comparison sites and opened an account. He deposited £1,000, and the account was blocked straight away for checks. He sent four months of bank statements and ID documents.

He never placed a bet. When he asked for his money back, £950 arrived. The email explains the missing £50: his "financial activity" had not exceeded 50% of the deposit, so withdrawing cost "a nominal 5% processing fee". In plain words: you didn't bet enough of your money with us, so we keep some of it.

It opens with "We value your trust in our platform."

The fee isn't the trick. Betting is.

The £50 was never the point. Put "lose £50 now" in front of most people, and they would rather bet £500 to reach the 50% and keep their money. Then the margin does the rest, and they lose a lot more than £50. This bettor was the rare one who took the loss and walked away.

Anything that keeps you betting is good for them. Some of it is the carrot: a welcome bonus, free bets, your "first bet covered", a free drink in Vegas. Some of it is the stick: a withdrawal fee, a turnover rule, a balance you can't take out yet. Carrot or stick, it's the same trick. It works on your head, not on the game.

This is the bettor's account, shared by Racing Tips. I can't check it myself. Rollerbet has the same free right of reply as every bookmaker in these files: write to [email protected] with the evidence, and the correction goes up next to it.

Before your first bet

Or skip all of it.

Don't even start.

MORE FROM THE WAR ON BOOKIES

Pending approval. And a red button. →

$3 into $25,000. Paid to say it. →

"Zero chance you can lose." The hurdles it leaves out →

All the sportsbook files →